|
Welcome
|
Overview |
Admissions |
Courses |
faculty |
Careers
WHAT IS PUBLIC
DIPLOMACY?
Syracuse University
views Public Diplomacy as a new
professional field that has evolved far beyond the traditional focus on
government funded and sponsored cultural/educational exchanges and
broadcasts to promote the national interest of a nation state. From our
perspective, it
includes non-governmental communications that have an impact on
government, as well as government communications that affect
non-governmental sectors, including the private sector.
There
are many ways to define public diplomacy. The US State Department defines
it as “government-sponsored programs intended to inform or influence
public opinion in other
countries” (1).
Edmund Gullion, a career diplomat and then Dean of Tufts University’s
Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy first coined the term in 1965 as
part of the founding of Fletcher’s
Edward
R. Murrow Center for Public Diplomacy.
In one of the Murrow Center’s earlier brochures, public diplomacy was
defined as follows:
Public diplomacy . . .
deals with the influence of public attitudes on the formation and
execution of foreign policies. It encompasses dimensions of
international relations beyond traditional diplomacy; the
cultivation by governments of public opinion in other countries; the
interaction of private groups and interests in one country with
those of another; the reporting of foreign affairs and its impact on
policy; communication between those whose job is communication, as
between diplomats and foreign correspondents; and the processes of
inter-cultural communications. Central to public diplomacy is the
transnational flow of information and ideas (2).
It is important to distinguish public diplomacy from traditional
diplomacy. Traditional diplomacy occurs between governments, i.e., from
a US embassy to the foreign ministry of another country. Public
diplomacy maintains a different and more transparent target audience,
namely the wider international public. Public diplomacy concerns itself
not with the comportment or policies of foreign governments, but rather
with attitudes and behaviors of publics. “Public
diplomacy activities often present many differing views as represented
by private ... individuals and organizations in addition to official ...
government views (3).”
This distinction helps
differentiate public diplomacy from propaganda, something Ed Murrow,
as Director of the United States Information Agency (USIA), eloquently
spoke to during his May 1963 testimony before a Congressional Committee.
"American traditions and the American ethic require us to be truthful,
but the most important reason is that truth is the best propaganda and
lies are the worst. To be persuasive we must be believable; to be
believable we must be credible; to be credible we must be truthful. It
is as simple as that (4)."
The
Center on
Public Diplomacy at the University of Southern California
offers extensive resources and provides an excellent starting point for
learning more about this area of study.
WHY STUDY PUBLIC
DIPLOMACY?
Increasingly, employers in
government, international organizations, not-for-profit organizations
and the NGO community, as well as the private sector, are looking for
people who understand diverse audiences at home and abroad and are
skillful at crafting messages that describe the organization, convey its
vision, and help the organization to communicate its message in times of
change or crisis.
The new two-degree program
in Public Diplomacy provides students with these skills and the academic
credentials from two highly visible schools at Syracuse University.
(1) US Department of
State, Dictionary of International Relations Terms,
Washington, DC, 1987, p. 85.
(2) United States
Information Agency Alumni Association, “What is Public Diplomacy?”
Washington, DC, updated September 1, 2002. Online at http://www.publicdiplomacy.org/1.htm.
|